Daily Archives: December 3, 2009

A Brief Note on Child Support and Undue Hardship

In Ontario there are two kinds of child support payable – the basic amount and the extraordinary amount. (For more information, see my December 4 blog “A Brief Note on Child Support and Extraordinary Expenses.”)

The basic amount (also called “table amount”) of child support payable is determined solely by the income level of the support payor under the Child Support Guidelines.* In other words, the income level of the recipient is irrelevant for the purpose of determining the basic amount payable.

Exceptions to the basic amount are few. The most commonly seen exception is for “undue hardship.”

For the purposes of this blog, we will limit the discussion to the federal Child Support Guidelines, enacted under the Divorce Act.+

There are several circumstances that may support the claim of undue hardship: an unusually high level of debts incurred to support the receiving spouse and children prior to the separation or to earn a living; unusually high expenses in relation to exercising access; and a legal duty to support another person.^

However, to claim undue hardship, the court must consider differences of living standards between the households. Under the law, the claim for must be denied if the court determines that the household of the spouse claiming undue hardship would have a higher standard of living than the household of the other spouse.

In comparing standards of living, the court would follow the schedule under the regulation, which provides an elaborate calculation formula. The formula provided is complicated, to say the very least, especially if you attempt to do the calculation with pen and paper. Therefore, most family law practitioners use a specialized computer program.

read more…

Tagged , , , , , ,

A Brief Note on the Limitation Period in Ontario

Limitation period” is a legal jargon meaning a statutory term after which a lawsuit (or prosecution) cannot be brought in court.

In Ontario the limitation period is governed by the Limitations Act, 2002. It’s interesting to note that in contrast to the law in other countries, such as the US, the Ontario Act is not applicable to offences under the Criminal Code^ because the Code falls under federal jurisdiction.

The basic limitation period in Ontario is two years from the day on which the claim was discovered.# For example, if you were involved in an automobile accident and suffered minor injuries, you would have to bring your claim before the court within two years, or your claim may be barred by the statute.

Nonetheless, the Act provides numerous exceptions under which the limitation period may differ from the basic two-year rule. Therefore, in the event that you wish to commence a proceeding, you should act promptly and consult with a lawyer to ensure that your claim is not barred by the statute.

*S.O. 2002, c. 24, Sch. B

^R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46

# Limitations Act, 2002, s. 4, 5

read more…

Tagged , , , , , , , ,