Monthly Archives: June 2010

Fraud Alert Update: Collaborative Family Law Agreement Fraud Becomes More Convincing

Two weeks ago I posted a blog on collaborative family law agreement scams. In that blog I noted a few red flags that may be indicative of a scam, such as the use of generic or universal terms in the initial contact message.

According to the latest bulletin from the Lawyer’s Professional Indemnity Company (LawPRO), the fraudsters are becoming more convincing.

For example, the fraudsters are now sending out personalized email messages with the lawyer’s first and last name at the beginning of the email. The fraudsters even send out follow-up emails inquiring whether the lawyer is willing to assist on the file.

Besides the apparent eagerness to retain the lawyer, the fraudsters are now able to provide colour scans of foreign IDs, including Chinese passports and U.S. driver’s licences. The fraudsters sometimes provide detailed background information and make phone calls that appear to be from local number by using spoof technologies.

In two instances the initial email was drafted to appear as if it were coming from a U.K. lawyer.

To make things worse, two Ontario lawyers who don’t practise family law thought that the emails were legitimate and passed them onto family law lawyers as referrals.

Here’s what LawPRO suggests to avoid becoming a victim of fraud: (emphasis is mine.)

Trust your instincts. If things don’t add up, ask more questions and dig deeper. Get the client on the phone and ask them to provide further background and explanation for anything that is inconsistent or that doesn’t make sense. Have them confirm details in the information they already provided to you and be especially wary if the client is hesitant or unclear on background facts. Don’t be naïve. In reply to our Alert last week, one lawyer said, “I’m relieved to hear you say that because I’m feeling sheepish for not having recognized that this was a scam from the get-go.”

If you have suspicions, carefully check and verify any background details provided to you. Ask for documentation from the client that will confirm details of any information provided to you. You can do a reverse lookup of phone numbers provided to you or that appear on call display; Google any addresses provided to you. Get the names of lawyers who previously acted for the client or ex-spouse, check online databases to verify they are real lawyers and ask for permission to contact them.

Ultimately, getting the retainer funds or payments from the ex-spouse irrevocably wired to your bank account is the only way to really protect yourself from this type of fraud. If these wires are coming from another Canadian financial institution, they should come via the Large Value Transaction System (“LVTS”).  If they are coming from a financial entity outside of Canada, the client or ex-spouse’s bank should make arrangements with your bank to wire the funds to your account.

As an alternative to getting funds wired into your account, tell your client that your firm’s policy is that all funds deposited by cheque or bank draft will be held for 30 days or until your firm is able to get confirmation that the funds have cleared.

Finally, you should terminate the retainer if you remain suspicious that the matter is a fraud.

Tagged , , , , ,

Custody Applications: Status Quo Matters

Today I observed a very interesting case conference at the Ontario Court of Justice in North York while waiting for my matter to be called.

The couple at the heart of the case have been separated for a few years. There has been no custody order, but the 9-year-old daughter lives with Mom. That means Mom has de facto custody (meaning “custody in fact”) and is responsible for making decisions regarding the daughter’s well-being.

Dad gets to see his daughter whenever he wants. Dad also gets to speak with the daughter on the phone at Dad’s convenience. Mom doesn’t interfere with Dad’s access at all. The daughter doesn’t have special needs and is doing rather well at school. However, Mom and Dad see each other as nemesis and don’t communicate with each other.

Interestingly, Dad brought an application before the court seeking joint custody of the daughter. Dad claimed that it would be better for the daughter if the Mom and Dad make the decisions jointly. (He knew better than to ask for sole custody.)

The judge was not happy about this application. He questioned Dad on the application’s merits. The judge explained the legal foundations in a custody application to the parties. I summarize the pertinent points below:

  1. In high conflict cases, such as the present one, where the parents are unable or unwilling to communicate with each other, the Ontario Court of Appeal has ruled that the court should not order joint custody.
  2. If the children are functioning well under the existing arrangement, absent compelling reasons, the court should not interfere.
  3. If there are indeed compelling reasons that warrant the court’s interference, the moving party has the burden to prove to the court through witnesses and evidence that the proposed alternative greatly advances the child’s best interests.

In the present matter, Dad acknowledged before the court that the existing access is functional and there are no compelling reasons to change. Dad further admitted that he wouldn’t have any witness other than himself to testify if a trial were to be held.

In the end, the matter was sent to a settlement conference to determine whether there are genuine issues that warrant a trial.

Note: Please keep in mind that this article is provided for information and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be regarded as such. The law may have changed since the publication of the article.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

What Goes Down with the Coming of the HST?

Believe it or not, the price of a few items will actually go down with the commencement of the new Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) in Ontario.

Examples include:

  • movie tickets
  • admission to professional sports events

I think I will wait until next weekend to see a movie.

Note: Please keep in mind that this article is provided for information and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be regarded as such. The law may have changed since the publication of the article.

Last Minute HST Savings

The Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) is coming in a few days. Here’s a list of some of the things that you may be able to get before the end of the month and save some money:

  • dry cleaning
  • commercial cleaning
  • gas
  • internet access (e.g. downloading legally licensed movies or large files)
  • home services (electrician, plumber, carpenter, etc)
  • landscaping and lawncare
  • hotel rooms
  • taxis
  • campsites
  • domestic travel originating in Ontario
  • home renovations
  • real estate commissions
  • accounting and bookkeeping services
  • massages offered by massage therapists
  • vitamins
  • sports lessons
  • tickets for live theatre fewer than 3,200 seats
  • hockey rink and hall rental fees
  • green fees for golf
  • haircuts
  • personal training lessons
  • spa services (e.g., manicures, pedicures, facials)
  • hunting and fishing licences
  • funeral services (Well, you can’t exactly rush this one, although you can buy a pre-paid package for yourself or someone you love.)

and finally…

  • legal fees!
Note: Please keep in mind that this article is provided for information and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be regarded as such. The law may have changed since the publication of the article.
Tagged , , , , ,

Cash Is Not Always King

Cash is not always king in the business world. While convenient and liquid, cash transactions often become a civil litigator’s nightmare.

If you’ve ever watched Judge Judy, you’ve probably noticed that among those petty claims between former lovers, a great majority of the transactions involve cash without independent witnesses. Judge Judy often has to exercise her judgment to decide who’s telling the truth.

I occasionally come across difficult-to-prove cash transaction in litigious matters. There are indeed ways to prove that cash has changed hands.

For example, for a significant amount of money, say, $10,000 or more, there is likely some record or document relating to the transaction. Under anti-money-laundering legislation,  financial institutions have a legal obligation to report large amounts of cash being deposited or withdrawn. You can probably get records from the bank regarding the transaction in question.

If the amount involved is petty, you may need to dig a bit further. ATM, withdrawal slips, or bank statements will show that money was withdrawn. If the amount withdrawn and the funds in dispute match, you will have an easier time convincing the judge that the transaction in question is indeed related to the withdrawal.

Note: Please keep in mind that this article is provided for information and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be regarded as such. The law may have changed since the publication of the article.

Fraud Alert: Beware of Collaborative Family Law Agreement Scams

There’s a new breed of scam in town. Fraudsters are contacting lawyers with claims that their former spouses have failed to honour collaborative family law agreements. I personally have received one of these emails, and so have several of my colleagues.

The email looks like this:

Dear Counsel,
My name is [**].  I am contacting your firm in regards to a
divorce settlement with my ex husband [**] who resides in
your jurisdiction.
I am currently on assignment in S.Korea. We had an out of court
agreement (Collaborative Law Agreement) for him to pay $648,450.00
plus legal fees. He has only paid me $148,000 since.
I am hereby seeking your firm`s assistance in collecting the balance
from him.He has agreed already to pay me the balance but it is my
belief that a Law firm like yours is needed to help me
collect/enforce payment from my ex-husband or litigate this matter if
he fails to pay as promised.
Your’s truly,
[**]

At least one lawyer has fallen victim to this scam, LAWPRO (Lawyer’s Professional Indemnity Company) reports.

The classic red flags are absent. The email is reasonably well-written with intelligent vocabulary. There’s no mention of a contingency fee (which would have been illegal in Ontario). The people behind the scheme are consistent and convincing.

According to LAWPRO, once the initial inquiry gets a response, the fraudsters promptly provide seemingly legitimate settlement papers. When the lawyer asked for a retainer agreement be executed, the fraudsters would promptly comply and promise  to pay the standard hourly rate with retainer money that will arrive shortly.

However, the case goes rather smoothly. No litigation ever happens. After a demand letter. the debtor spouse’s cheque arrives earlier than the retainer money from the “client.” The “client” then comes up with a sob story and pressure the lawyer to wire the money overseas citing financial hardship. The lawyer wire the money out after deducting the legal fees. A happy ending right?

Wrong. The cheque turns out to be a fake and the lawyer ends up with a shortfall in the trust account.

If you examine the email carefully, there are a few items that are indicative of a scam.

For example,  the terms used in the email are generic: “Dear Counsel” rather than “Mr.” or “Ms.”; “residing in your jurisdiction” rather than “living in Ontario”; “your firm” rather than the firm’s name. In other words, this email comes from a cookie cutter and couldbe applicable anywhere.

Beware of scams! If a deal goes a little bit too smoothly, you may want to hold on to the funds held in trust a little longer.

Tagged , , , , ,

PSWLaw Office Closure: June 18, 2010

Pei-Shing B. Wang, Barrister & Solicitor, 700 Bay St., Unit 405 (Box 144) Toronto, ON M5G 1H2

Please note that our office will be closed on June 18, 2010, for our moving to the new address.

The new address is as follows:

LuCliff Place

700 Bay St., Suite 405 (Box 144)

Toronto ON M5G 1Z6

Our new fax number is: 416 924 9973

Phone number is the same: 416 433 5531

Don’t Fall for the “Save the HST” Trap

If you live in Ontario, you’ll probably have noticed TV and radio commercials pressuring consumers to “hurry up and save the HST” before July 1, 2010, when the HST becomes applicable.

Truth be told, the vast majority (83%, according to the Ontario government) of goods sold in Ontario won’t be subject to “sticker shock” like the commercials suggest. This is because for most goods, the new HST (Harmonized Sales Tax) effectively replaces both the Goods and Sales Tax (GST) and the provincial Retail Sales Tax (PST). For example, goods that are currently subject to the 5% GST and the 8% RST will become taxed at 13% under the HST after July 1, 2010. The total tax payable on these items remain 13% of the sticker price.

That being said, till the end of this month you can save on certain services that are not currently subject to the 8% PST. You may want to make a few phone calls and do a few things a few days early so you can save a bit.

For example, you may want to get the following things done in June rather than waiting until July:

  • take your pets to the vet for their check-up
  • get a fancy haircut (if it’s called for)
  • dry clean your winter coats
  • call your plumber, electrician, interior decorator, web designer, massage therapist, and any other professionals whose service you may require in the summer
  • buy a house (save on commission)

Remember to act early. The closer to the deadline of  July 1, 2010, the more difficult it will be to get an appointment!

Note: Please keep in mind that this article is provided for information and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be regarded as such. The law may have changed since the publication of the article.

Tagged , , , , ,

New Contents Added:“A Lawyer’s Retainer” Available in Chinese

I’m pleased to announce that a new article written in traditional Chinese is now available on the site. Click on the link to view the article.

預付金及律師費 A Lawyer’s Retainer

How Does a Lawyer’s Retainer Work?

When you hire a lawyer, he or she is likely going to ask for a retainer. Today’s blog explains how the retainer system works.

Think of the retainer as a deposit held by the lawyer. The retainer will be made “in trust” and deposited into a designated trust account as mandated by the Law Society.

The retainer will then be used for out-of-pocket expenses that the lawyer must pay on behalf of the client as a result of carrying of the file. Examples of such expenses include court filing fees and process server charges.

Depending on the law firm’s operating procedure, the lawyer will render accounts periodically or at the end of the service. The bill will include legal fees and disbursement charges. Disbursement charges may include many of the “soft costs” that are directly attributable to the file, such as photocopying, fax, courier, long distance calls, and so on.

Only after the bill has been rendered can the lawyer transfer the billed amount from the trust account to his general operating account. Any unused portion of the retainer will be returned to the client at the conclusion of the matter.

Items that are not directly attributable to the file,  such as office rent, are considered overhead, not disbursement charges. These should not be billed to the client.

If the retainer becomes exhausted during the carriage of the file, then the client may be asked to replenish it. He or she may be asked for a further retainer in the amount that the lawyer thinks appropriate.

Effective July 1, 2010, the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) will be added to legal fees and certain disbursements. Prior to July 1, 2010, only the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is applicable.

Tagged , ,
Page 1 of 212