Animal Welfare

Tornadoes, Hurricanes, Tsunamis, and Earthquakes: Creating an Emergency Plan for Your Pets

Let’s face it: natural disasters are a fact of life. In Toronto, we are blessed with geological and geographical advantages. Toronto rests on a piece of more-or-less stable land mass and is far inland from the coastlines, perched on the edge of Lake Ontario. In comparison with other major North American cities - like Oklahoma City (tornadoes), New Orleans (hurricanes), Honolulu (tsunamis), and Los Angeles (earthquakes) – we suffer much less.

That being said, Toronto does occasionally suffer from major snowstorms in the winter and thunderstorms and tornadoes in the summer. Blackouts are not uncommon after natural disasters strike.

As a result of recent high-profile disasters such as hurricane Katrina, the South Asian tsunami, and earthquakes in Japan and Haiti, more and more citizens are aware of the importance of emergency contingency plans. Such plans generally include access to clean water, food, flashlights, batteries, radios, etc. However, for pet parents, the work doesn’t stop there. Pet parents need emergency plans for their pets as well.

Below are some tips for creating a contingency plan for your pets when disasters strike, as suggested by the World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA) Canada:*

  • water – enough water for your animals for at least 72 hours
  • food – enough food for 72 hours; a manual can opener if you are packing canned food
  • vaccinations kept up to date and medical records packed for emergencies
  • plastic bags and absorbent towels
  • reflective collar and lease; a muzzle
  • current photo in case your pet gets lost
  • animal carrier, preferably with wheels
  • first-aid kits
  • spare name tags to identify your animals

In case of evacuation, bringing your pets with you can be challenging as many human shelters don’t allow animals. If you’re forced to leave your pets behind, don’t tie them up. Leave plenty of clean water and food throughout your residence, including on tabletops and countertops. (If your residence becomes flooded, at least some clean water and food may be preserved.) Leave signs and stickers outside so rescuers know there is an animal inside.

*”When Disaster Strikes, Are You Prepared?” World Society for the Protection of Animals (29 June 2011) online: WSPA <http://www.wspa.ca/latestnews/2011/When_disaster_strikes_are_you_prepared.aspx>

Major Pet Store Chain Announces End of Puppy Sales: The Evils of Puppy Mills

Major pet store chain PJ’s Pets has announced that its stores will stop selling puppies on September 1, 2011, reports The Toronto Star.+ Rather than sell puppies, the chain will promote pet adoption from animal shelters or humane societies.

I applaud this decision. Puppies available for sale at retailers are often purchased from brokers that provide the retailers with puppies that are competitively priced but of questionable origins.

Many puppies sold at retail stores are from “puppy mills,” where mother dogs are constantly impregnated without regard to their health. The environment of puppy mills is typically unsanitary and overcrowded.

The mother dogs are typically confined in small cages without exercise or adequate care. They may spend their days in their own feces and urine. Some are put in stacked cages with wire flooring that injures their paws and legs. Some spend their entire useful life outdoors without shelter from the elements. Serious medical conditions that are common at puppy mills include malnutrition, parasites, urine burns, rotten teeth, severely overgrown nails, matted fur, skin diseases, blindness, ear infections, wire cuts and open wounds, and overall weakness.

Once the breeding dog has gone beyond its prime (usually at 4 years of age), it is often discarded, abandoned, or killed. The lucky ones are shot; the unlucky ones are starved to death.

The misery isn’t confined to the mother dogs. Upon their arrival at the retailer, the puppies are left in the display windows for prolonged periods of time without adequate care, socialization, or exercise. Prolonged isolation, inadequate care, and lack of socialization are detrimental to a puppy’s overall development. Because of the mistreatment of mother dogs, store-bought puppies are often born with defects that lead to a lifetime of poor health.

At times, new pet parents discover serious health problems in their new pets shortly after the purchase. When this happens, the new pet owner faces a grim dilemma of either putting the pet down or facing substantial veterinary expenses. (Most retailers do not accept returns.) Perhaps a handful of owners sue in small claims court for damages, with limited success.

Such are the evils of puppy mills.

+Vanessa Lu, “PJ’s Pets Ends Puppy Sales” The Toronto Star (16 August 2011) online: <http://www.thestar.com/business/article/1040266>

Toronto Man Accused of Animal Cruelty Charges; Alleged to Have Attacked Baby Raccoon with Shovel in His Backyard

Photograph used under licence by stock.xchng; all rights reserved.

A Toronto man is facing charges of animal cruelty and possession of a weapon for dangerous purposes for allegedly attacking a family of raccoons with a shovel in his backyard last month.

Witnesses recalled being awakened by the sound of the man allegedly attacking a family of raccoons in his backyard on June 1, 2011. Police were called soon after.

The crown prosecutor told the court that it will proceed through a lesser charge of summary conviction, rather than by indictment. If convicted by indictment, the accused would have faced up to 10 years of imprisonment for the weapon charge.

Under the summary conviction proceeding, the accused risks 2 years in custody.

Animal Services found that one baby raccoon suffered from broken toes and was sent to a rehabilitation centre for treatment. The conditions of the rest of the raccoons are unknown as the mother took the babies away.

The allegations have not been proven in court. The accused is considered innocent until proven guilty.

Regardless of the outcome, I can’t stress enough that violence is never a solution in a free and democratic society like ours. If you feel your home is being invaded by unwanted animals - be they raccoons, snakes, or wasps - it’s perhaps best to contact animal services or a private wildlife control company so the intruders may be removed humanely. Anyone who beats a baby raccoon with a shovel is both barbaric and cowardly and is condemned by this office.

Helping Animals Affected by Earthquake in Japan – Japan Earthquake Animal Rescue and Support

While relief workers are desperately seeking human survivors in Japan, more than one week after the earthquake and tsunami struck, there has been very little news media coverage of the plight of pets and other animals in the region.

One sliver of good news came to light when rescue workers found a dog guarding a second, injured dog amid the rubble, refusing to leave until both were rescued a few days ago. However, local rescue groups say that this example of attention to the problem is rare.

The truth is that, by and large, animals are not priorities for most at a time when more than 10,000 people are still unaccounted for.

According to NYdailynews.com, a woman was found by rescue workers wandering aimlessly with her collie. She said she had stayed in her damaged house for three days because many shelters refused to accept her canine companion.

Please consider donating to the following groups that are in desperate need of funds for supplies and assistance:

  • Animal Refuge Kansai is a rescue group located in the western region of Japan and is assisting with rescue efforts. Donate by PayPal at www.arkbark.net.

I have made a small donation to Japan Earthquake Animal Rescue and Support on behalf of PSWLaw as a gesture toward helping those animals that can be saved. I hope readers will also extend a helping hand to the animals who would otherwise be left behind.

Image courtesy of NYdailynews.com, used soley for news reporting purposes.

Dog and Cat Fur on Your Coat

Next time you’re at the mall, take a closer look at the labels on those furry coats and parkas with fur trimmings. Last time I checked, the label said “Asian raccoon.” Of course, I had no idea what an “Asian raccoon” looks like, and I quickly moved on.

Alas, it may have been a dog.

According to activist group the Association for the Protection of Fur-Bearing Animals, millions  of dogs and cats are slaughtered in Asia for their fur and pelts every year. The products are turned into trimmings, hats, stuffed animals, and fashion accessories. In some cases, the furs are dyed and processed to resemble the texture of faux fur.

Why would people go to all the trouble to harvest the fur and pelts from cats and dogs, only to make them look like synthetic materials?

Cost may be the sole reason. While most pet owners would be appalled with a label indicating “dog fur,” consumers love a good bargain. Thus, the manufacturers get creative with the wording on the labels.

For example, dog fur may be labelled “Asian wolf,” while cat fur may be passed off as “rabbit.” (Frankly, even “rabbit fur” gives me the creeps, but that’s another story.)

Sadly, it remains legal to import and sell cat and dog fur in Canada. It’s another blow to our hope that animal-friendly values prevail in our society, already challenged by the B.C. dog slaughtering earlier this week. Other developed nations, including the U.S., the EU, Australia, and Switzerland, have successfully banned the importation and sale of dog and cat fur.

I believe that short of swift legislative action against the importation and sale of dog and cat fur, this practice will likely be sustained by the market. Currently, the Association for the Protection of Fur-Bearing Animals is working with NDP MP Bill Siksay to require mandatory labelling of fur products.

What can you do until the law is changed? The Association for the Protection of Fur-Bearing Animals suggests the following:

  1. Don’t buy fur.
  2. Don’t buy anything that looks like fur.
  3. Don’t shop at stores that sell fur, and tell the manager why.

I add one more thing:

4. Show your friends the picture of your beloved pet and point out that the trimming of their coat may have been made with one of your pet’s cousins.

B.C.’s Pet-Friendly Antifreeze Legislation Mandates Bitter Agent

The Government of British Columbia is taking measures to prevent ingestion of antifreeze by animals (mostly household pets) and small children by mandating that a bitter agent be added to all antifreeze sold by retailers, starting January 2011.

In the bitterly cold Canadian winter, antifreeze is a common household item, used primarily in cars and sometimes as a surface treatment for sidewalks and driveways to prevent ice from building up.

The main ingredient in antifreeze, ethylene  glycol, is toxic to many animals and humans. It causes poisoning by damaging the liver and interfering with the central nervous system.

Unfortunately, antifreeze has a naturally sweet flavour, which makes its taste appealing to animals and small children. While children are supervised by adults, household pets are often left on their own. When they come across antifreeze, they may lap it up because it tastes good, or simply because they are thirsty.

To combat accidental ingestion of antifreeze by household pets and small children, the B.C. government introduced new antifreeze regulation in 2009. The new law,* which takes effect on January 1, 2011, mandates that all antifreeze sold by retailers must contain denatonium benzonate, a bitter agent.

Denatonium benzonate, often referred to by trade names such as Bitrex or Averson, is the bitterest chemical compound known. It does not interfere with the working mechanism of antifreeze, nor does it cause known long-term health risks.

The law, the first one of its kind in Canada, is welcomed by animal welfare groups and parents with small children in B.C. Let’s hope other provinces and territories will follow suit soon.

*B.C. Reg. 142/2009

Our Dog-Friendly Law Office

After consultation with our staff members and colleagues who share the office with us, I’m pleased to announce that our law office is now officially dog-friendly.

While I’ve always been a dog lover and for the past 10 years also a pet parent, our dog-friendly policy wasn’t my idea originally. (I never thought dogs and law are that compatible.)

One day a client came to the office with her dog because she couldn’t find someone to mind  the Yorkshire terrier mix during her consultation. At first I was reluctant to let the dog into the office. But at the end of the appointment, my staff members wouldn’t let the dog go!

After that visit I decided to bring Ben Wang, my youngest household member, to work on a trial basis. After a few visits staff members and colleagues started asking about the dog and when he would be in next. People in the office seem much more relaxed when a dog is around. They joke more and appear less tense.

Yesterday we had a meeting with everyone in the office. The consensus was that we should make our law office dog-friendly. I then volunteered to bring Ben in on the days that I don’t have appointments.

At the same time, to maintain a high level of professionalism, clients need not worry about dogs running everywhere. We bring the dogs in when the office is quiet, and they are kept from visitors.

We have the following amenities available for our four-legged guests and companions:

  • pet bed
  • water bowl
  • treats (no extra charge)
  • lots of love

Guest Appearance: Ben Wang, age 5


Tagged , , , , , ,

Ontario’s Ban on Pit Bulls Hasn’t Cut Dog Bites: Study

dog bute chart

Five years ago Ontario banned pit bull dogs in the province citing “public safety.”* On Wednesday, the Toronto Humane Society released a study indicating that the ban has not been as effective as the government had anticipated.

In addition to a ban on pit bulls, the law also targets any dog that bites, attacks, or is a menace to public safety. Owners face fines of up to $10,000 and/or imprisonment for up to six months.

While it’s easy to blame the dogs, perhaps it’s time to put the blame on irresponsible owners.

Graphic courtesy of the Toronto Humane Society

*Dog Owners’ Liability Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. D-16

In loving memory of Tara Wang, died from pancreatic cancer on February 2, 2004.

Tagged , ,

Animal Rights Groups Sue Edmonton over Ill Elephant

Yesterday The National Post reported this story on two animal rights group suing the City of Edmonton for allegedly breaching Alberta’s Animal Protection Act by mistreating Lucy the elephant.

The suit was brought by Zoocheck Canada and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). Their claim was accompanied with affidavits from several experts.

The organizations claim that the elephant is overweight and in distress, and that her condition has been exacerbated by being kept in solitude from other elephants.

The city, meanwhile, has determined that moving Lucy to a sanctuary would be detrimental to her in her current state.

Tagged , , ,

The World’s Oldest Dog Dies at 21

The Associated Press- The world’s oldest dog,  Chanel, a fun-loving dachshund died on Friday, August 28, 2008 at age of 21, or 141, in dog years.

The playful pup was only six weeks old when she was adopted by the owner Denice Shaughnessy, then serving with the U.S. Army, adopted her from a shelter in Newport News, Va. The dog then stationed in Germany with her parents for nine years.

Karl Shaughnessy, co-parent of Chanel, nominated her for the title of world’s oldest dog after noticing the Guinness World Records book had no record.

Guinness World Records officials presented Chanel with a certificate as the world’s oldest dog at a Manhattan birthday bash hosted by a private pet food company in May.

RIP Chanel.

Page 1 of 212