It’s well-established in contemporary Canadian jurisprudence that when dealing with a child, the best interests of that child must prevail.
But what, exactly, count as the child’s best interests?
Section 24 of the Children’s Law Reform Act* specifies these interests. In determining the best interests of a child, the court must consider all the child’s needs and circumstances, including the following factors:
- the love, affection and emotional ties between the child and the child’s family members and those who are involved in the child’s care and up-bringing
- the child’s views and preferences if they can be reasonably ascertained
- the length of time the child has lived in a stable home environment
- the ability and willingness of each person applying for custody of the child to provide guidance and education, the necessaries of life and any special needs of the child
- any plans proposed for the child’s care and up-bringing
- the permanence and stability of the family unit
- the ability of each person to act as a parent
- the relationship by blood or through an adoption order
In addition to the above factors mandated by the legislation, the common law also requires other points, such as cultural heritage and race be considered under the appropriate circumstances.^
The legislation is clear that a person’s past conduct can only be considered if it relates to the factors above or if the court is satisfied that the conduct is otherwise relevant to the person’s ability to act as a parent.
In determining the person’s ability to act as a parent, the court inquires whether the person has ever committed violence or abuse against the following persons:
- his or her spouse
- a parent of the child in question
- a member of the person’s household
- any child
*R.S.O. 1009, c. C.12
^see e.g. Van der Perre v. Edwards, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014; 69 RFL (5th) 396
PSWLaw has the best interests of child in mind when dealing with custody and access matters.
Please Note: This article is provided for information and educational purposes. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be regarded as such. Legislation and/or regulation referred to may have been amended or repealed since the publication of the article.





