<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for PSW Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pswlaw.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pswlaw.ca</link>
	<description>Toronto Family Law Lawyer; Divorce, Separation, Custody, Access, Child Support, Spousal Support, Separation Agreement, Marriage Contract, Foreign Divorce Letter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:51:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Publication Bans and Sealing Orders in Family Law: The Partial Publication Ban on Russell Williams&#8217;s Divorce by Pei Wang</title>
		<link>http://pswlaw.ca/2011/08/publication-ban-and-sealing-orders-in-family-la/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>Pei Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pswlaw.ca/?p=2429#comment-993</guid>
		<description>Update: The publication ban order has been largely set aside by the Court of Appeal on January 24, 2012. Please refer to the link below.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://pswlaw.ca/2012/02/publication-ban-in-williamss-divorce-case-is-set-aside/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; &quot;Publication Ban in Williams&#039;s Divorce Is Set Aside,&quot; posted February 6, 2012 &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: The publication ban order has been largely set aside by the Court of Appeal on January 24, 2012. Please refer to the link below.<br />
<a href="http://pswlaw.ca/2012/02/publication-ban-in-williamss-divorce-case-is-set-aside/" rel="nofollow"> &#8220;Publication Ban in Williams&#8217;s Divorce Is Set Aside,&#8221; posted February 6, 2012 </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pei-Shing B. Wang of PSWLaw Featured in World Journal by Remi</title>
		<link>http://pswlaw.ca/2012/01/pei-shing-b-wang-of-pswlaw-featured-in-world-journal/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Remi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pswlaw.ca/?p=2632#comment-990</guid>
		<description>Great article Pei!!  It is a tribute to your hard work and dedication to the profession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Pei!!  It is a tribute to your hard work and dedication to the profession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pei-Shing B. Wang of PSWLaw Featured in World Journal by Norm</title>
		<link>http://pswlaw.ca/2012/01/pei-shing-b-wang-of-pswlaw-featured-in-world-journal/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Norm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pswlaw.ca/?p=2632#comment-989</guid>
		<description>Congradulations . All your hard work is paying off.You are making a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congradulations . All your hard work is paying off.You are making a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Positive Feedback on the Mandatory Information Program (MIP) in Family Law by Jane</title>
		<link>http://pswlaw.ca/2011/12/positive-feedback-on-the-mandatory-information-program-mip-in-family-law/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pswlaw.ca/?p=2583#comment-935</guid>
		<description>Off-course MIP help you to understand a lot of ISSUE and how to protect our self..
Nice Report! Pei Wang .. thank for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off-course MIP help you to understand a lot of ISSUE and how to protect our self..<br />
Nice Report! Pei Wang .. thank for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Helping Animals Affected by Earthquake in Japan &#8211; Japan Earthquake Animal Rescue and Support by Josephine</title>
		<link>http://pswlaw.ca/2011/03/helping-animals-affected-by-earthquake-in-japan-japan-earthquake-animal-rescue-and-support/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Josephine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 07:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pswlaw.ca/?p=2085#comment-931</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post and information of animals in need, I&#039;ve never realized before how disasters also effect the animals also. Thank you for the awareness! 
I have made a donation to the Animal Refuge Kansai fund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post and information of animals in need, I&#8217;ve never realized before how disasters also effect the animals also. Thank you for the awareness!<br />
I have made a donation to the Animal Refuge Kansai fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Annulment of Marriages in Ontario by InterestedReader</title>
		<link>http://pswlaw.ca/2011/11/annulment-of-marriages-in-ontario/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>InterestedReader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 01:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pswlaw.ca/?p=2559#comment-924</guid>
		<description>If an applicant for an Ontario license did not disclose a foreign marriage/divorce and stated never married, thus not providing any of the required documentation for a foreign divorce, would the marriage even be valid? Or grounds for an annulment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If an applicant for an Ontario license did not disclose a foreign marriage/divorce and stated never married, thus not providing any of the required documentation for a foreign divorce, would the marriage even be valid? Or grounds for an annulment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Brief Note on Child Support and Extraordinary Expenses &#8211; What Counts? by Pei Wang</title>
		<link>http://pswlaw.ca/2009/12/child-support-of-extraordinary-expenses-what-counts/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>Pei Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pswlaw.ca/?p=454#comment-789</guid>
		<description>Under the Guidelines, the court may award add-ons upon the request of a parent. Typically, the add-ons may include the following:

-daycare expenses
-dental or medical insurance premiums attributable to the child
-health-related expenses exceeding $100 after insurance reimbursement
-extraordinary expenses of educational programs that meets the child’s best interests
-post-secondary education
-extraordinary expenses of extracurricular programs

In deciding the appropriate amount payable, the court must consider the necessity and the reasonableness of the expenses incurred, the best interests of the child, and the means of the parents, and the spending pattern during cohabitation or marriage.

Since the Guidelines has come into force, there had been disputes on what constitutes as “extraordinary expenses.” Do swimming lessons count? What about training for the Olympics for competitive swimming?

To clear things up, the regulation was amended to include the definition of “extraordinary expenses.” To be qualified as an extraordinary expense under the Guidelines, it will be expenses exceeding that of the parent requesting the add-on can reasonably cover.

In the alternative, the court may consider the expenses extraordinary after taking the following factors into consideration:

-the amount in relation to the income of the parent requesting the add on,
-the nature and the number of the educational or extracurricular activities,
-the special needs or talent of the child,
-the over all cost of the program, and
-any other factor that the court considers relevant.

The expenses are shared by the parents in proportion to their income, rather than split in the middle 50%-50%.

*O. Reg. 391/97, s. 7

This Blog is provided for your reference only and is not a substitute for the law. The law may have changed since the publication of this article. This article is not legal advice and should not be regarded as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under the Guidelines, the court may award add-ons upon the request of a parent. Typically, the add-ons may include the following:</p>
<p>-daycare expenses<br />
-dental or medical insurance premiums attributable to the child<br />
-health-related expenses exceeding $100 after insurance reimbursement<br />
-extraordinary expenses of educational programs that meets the child’s best interests<br />
-post-secondary education<br />
-extraordinary expenses of extracurricular programs</p>
<p>In deciding the appropriate amount payable, the court must consider the necessity and the reasonableness of the expenses incurred, the best interests of the child, and the means of the parents, and the spending pattern during cohabitation or marriage.</p>
<p>Since the Guidelines has come into force, there had been disputes on what constitutes as “extraordinary expenses.” Do swimming lessons count? What about training for the Olympics for competitive swimming?</p>
<p>To clear things up, the regulation was amended to include the definition of “extraordinary expenses.” To be qualified as an extraordinary expense under the Guidelines, it will be expenses exceeding that of the parent requesting the add-on can reasonably cover.</p>
<p>In the alternative, the court may consider the expenses extraordinary after taking the following factors into consideration:</p>
<p>-the amount in relation to the income of the parent requesting the add on,<br />
-the nature and the number of the educational or extracurricular activities,<br />
-the special needs or talent of the child,<br />
-the over all cost of the program, and<br />
-any other factor that the court considers relevant.</p>
<p>The expenses are shared by the parents in proportion to their income, rather than split in the middle 50%-50%.</p>
<p>*O. Reg. 391/97, s. 7</p>
<p>This Blog is provided for your reference only and is not a substitute for the law. The law may have changed since the publication of this article. This article is not legal advice and should not be regarded as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Brief Note on Child Support and Extraordinary Expenses &#8211; What Counts? by Amy Matwijow</title>
		<link>http://pswlaw.ca/2009/12/child-support-of-extraordinary-expenses-what-counts/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Matwijow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pswlaw.ca/?p=454#comment-784</guid>
		<description>I would like to have some samples of what has been passed through the courts that is &quot;extraordindary&quot; expense.  Eg School uniforms, registration fees</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to have some samples of what has been passed through the courts that is &#8220;extraordindary&#8221; expense.  Eg School uniforms, registration fees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Separation Agreements Are Subject to Best Interests of Child and Child Support Guidelines by Separation Contracts</title>
		<link>http://pswlaw.ca/2011/07/separation-agreements-are-subject-to-the-best-interests-of-child-and-child-support-guidelines/#comment-779</link>
		<dc:creator>Separation Contracts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pswlaw.ca/?p=2372#comment-779</guid>
		<description>I am happy that at least somebody gave this subject an attention.This is example of the excellency and perfection.!!@bose</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am happy that at least somebody gave this subject an attention.This is example of the excellency and perfection.!!@bose</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Landlords and Tenants: Know Your Rights by M#</title>
		<link>http://pswlaw.ca/2009/04/know-your-rights/#comment-778</link>
		<dc:creator>M#</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 06:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pswlaw.ca/?p=315#comment-778</guid>
		<description>There is great information on how the Metro Tenants helped an NDP minister win an illegal rent increase AGAINST the tenants because her government was funding their group &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.torontotenantsassociations.ca/ndp-akande.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ken Hale Ontario lawyer&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is great information on how the Metro Tenants helped an NDP minister win an illegal rent increase AGAINST the tenants because her government was funding their group <a href="http://www.torontotenantsassociations.ca/ndp-akande.html" rel="nofollow">Ken Hale Ontario lawyer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

